Free Essays on Relate John Gasts Painting To The Story White Mans Indian

Relating John Gast’s Painting to White Man’s Indian There are many similarities between John Gast’s painting and the short story White Man’s Indian. Both the story and the painting illustrate the relation ship between White settlers and the Native Americans. Also, they represent the same period of time. The painting shows farms and an infrastructure on the right side of the painting â€Å"the east† and a rugged wilderness with Native Americans in â€Å"the west.† There is an angel in the middle that represents the border between the east and west. Everything to the right of the angel â€Å"east† is lightly colored, and everything to the right â€Å"west’ is dark and gloomy. In White Man’s Indian the author says â€Å"Another persistent theme in White imagery (of the Indians) is the tendency to describe Indian life, in terms of lack of white.† This perception of Native Americans is well illustrated in the painting by the contrast of white in the east and dark in the wester n Indian territory. This is a clear example of the stereotypes that the author of The White Man’s Indian is describing. Another topic the author briefly talks about is whites ego, and their identity as imperialists. The painting shows this belief with the symbol of the angel. An angel is a religious symbol and is associated in western culture as something good or divine. In the painting the angel is leading the way westward. The angel shows the White’s belief in manifest destiny because an angel wouldn’t do anything wrong, so the symbol represents their God given right to the west.... Free Essays on Relate John Gast's Painting To The Story White Man's Indian Free Essays on Relate John Gast's Painting To The Story White Man's Indian Relating John Gast’s Painting to White Man’s Indian There are many similarities between John Gast’s painting and the short story White Man’s Indian. Both the story and the painting illustrate the relation ship between White settlers and the Native Americans. Also, they represent the same period of time. The painting shows farms and an infrastructure on the right side of the painting â€Å"the east† and a rugged wilderness with Native Americans in â€Å"the west.† There is an angel in the middle that represents the border between the east and west. Everything to the right of the angel â€Å"east† is lightly colored, and everything to the right â€Å"west’ is dark and gloomy. In White Man’s Indian the author says â€Å"Another persistent theme in White imagery (of the Indians) is the tendency to describe Indian life, in terms of lack of white.† This perception of Native Americans is well illustrated in the painting by the contrast of white in the east and dark in the wester n Indian territory. This is a clear example of the stereotypes that the author of The White Man’s Indian is describing. Another topic the author briefly talks about is whites ego, and their identity as imperialists. The painting shows this belief with the symbol of the angel. An angel is a religious symbol and is associated in western culture as something good or divine. In the painting the angel is leading the way westward. The angel shows the White’s belief in manifest destiny because an angel wouldn’t do anything wrong, so the symbol represents their God given right to the west....

Key Facts About the War on Drugs

Key Facts About the War on Drugs What Is the War on Drugs? The War on Drugs is a general term used to refer to the federal governments attempts to end the import, manufacture, sale, and use of illegal drugs. Its a colloquial term that does not refer in any meaningful way to a specific policy or objective, but rather to a series of anti-drug initiatives that are vaguely directed towards the common goal of ending drug abuse. Origin of the Phrase War on Drugs President Dwight D. Eisenhower began what The New York Times then called a new war on narcotic addiction at the local, national, and international level with the establishment of an Interdepartmental Committee on Narcotics on November 27, 1954, which was responsible for coordinating executive branch anti-drug efforts. The phrase War on Drugs first came into common use after President Richard Nixon used it at a press conference on June 17, 1971, during which he described illegal drugs as public enemy number one in the United States. Chronology of Federal Anti-drug Policy 1914: The Harrison Narcotics Tax Act regulates the distribution of narcotics (heroin and other opiates). Federal law enforcement will later incorrectly classify cocaine, a central nervous system stimulant, as a narcotic and regulate it under the same legislation.​1937: The Marijuana Tax Act extends federal restrictions to cover marijuana.1954: The Eisenhower administration takes a significant, albeit largely symbolic, step in establishing a U.S. Interdepartmental Committee on Narcotics.1970: The Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970 establishes federal anti-drug policy as we know it. Human Cost of the War on Drugs According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, 55% of federal prisoners and 21% of state-level prisoners are incarcerated on the basis of drug-related offenses. This means that over a half million people are presently incarcerated as a result of anti-drug laws- more than the population of Wyoming. The illegal drug trade also sustains gang activity, and is indirectly responsible for an unknown number of homicides. (The FBIs Uniform Crime Reports describe 4% of homicides as being directly attributable to the illegal drug trade, but it plays an indirect role in a much larger percentage of homicides.) Monetary Cost of the War on Drugs According to the White Houses National Drug Control Strategy Budgets, as cited in Action Americas Drug War Cost Clock, the federal government alone is projected to spend over $22 billion on the War on Drugs in 2009. State spending totals are harder to isolate, but Action America cites a 1998 Columbia University study which found that states spent over $30 billion on drug law enforcement during that year. Constitutionality of the War on Drugs The federal governments authority to prosecute drug-related offenses theoretically stems from Article Is Commerce Clause, which grants Congress the authority to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes- but federal law enforcement targets drug offenders even when the illegal substance is manufactured and distributed only within state lines. Public Opinion Regarding the War on Drugs According to an October 2008 Zogby poll of likely voters, 76% describe the War on Drugs as a failure. In 2009, the Obama administration announced that it would no longer use the phrase War on Drugs to refer to federal anti-drug efforts, the first administration in 40 years not to do so.